hello-im-david-beckham

Common Core and David Beckham

Mike Lee Assessment, Education, Education Policy

SHARE THIS STORY: Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on Google+

I know what you are thinking.

In Arizona, they aren’t called the Common Core Standards, they are called the Arizona College and Career Readiness Standards (ACCRS).  The name change was part of an effort to disconnect the standards from conspiracy theories about a United Nations takeover and even a supposed Hitler-esque indoctrination model.  Apparently a name change is enough to appease some, and distract others, even though “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.”

To those people: I would like to announce that I am now “David Beckham.”

As I’ve written about before, there are very legitimate concerns surrounding Common Core, but from an educator’s perspective, many are directly linked to implementation and execution questions.  These would include a lack of teacher training, appropriate benchmarking, and a “hard start” with a new assessment when students have only one year of Common Core infused instruction.   And, these are standards that are built upon conceptual and sequential learning that takes years to scaffold.

Next year’s testable students will not have that foundation of learning, and what experiences they have accumulated will have been facilitated by teachers who were doing their best with limited professional development.

Sounds like a recipe for success.  Now, let me highlight one more concerning variable.

We aren’t looking for the highest quality assessment.  We’re looking for the cheapest and buying from the lowest bidder.

Invariably, the discount test will remove the most sophisticated measurement components, and replace them with the simplest.  It will isolate small components of the curriculum and eliminate others.  Could this work?  Potentially.  I might be able to better predict how we will do next year, but we have yet to choose Arizona’s assessment, and a decision isn’t expected until the fall.

Essentially, we’ll be choosing the cheapest possible assessment at the last possible minute.

Sounds promising, doesn’t it?

Keep you eyes on this issue, it will be attention well appropriated.

Then again, what do I know?  I’m just an international-playboy-model-soccer star.

 

Mike Lee

Phoenix, Arizona

I am the Director of Outreach and Engagement for The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, and certified as a Middle Childhood Generalist in 2004. In 2012, I received my doctorate in educational leadership from Northern Arizona University, however, I began my work in education serving as a para-educator in a special education program while still an undergraduate. My passions in the field include assessment and reporting strategies, the evolving role of technology, teacher leadership, and effective professional development that permanently impacts instruction. I consider myself a professional teacher first, as well as a professionally evolving lifelong learner, who is incredibly fortunate to have the opportunity to impact the lives of children.

» Mike's Stories
» Contact Mike

Comments 1

  1. Jen R

    Thank you for posting this “very real” piece. You bring up an important point that needs to be addressed. Yes, students testing next year will not have that foundation of learning they need to successfully demonstrate mastery of the standards. As well, teachers’ limited professional development and experience of the standards will prove to be another obstacle.
    I also worry about our teacher evaluation system thrown in the mix. Each creates a different and very real distraction for teachers. How do we move forward and stay hopeful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *